|
課程名稱 |
基礎設施的技術政治
techno-politics of infrastructure |
|
開課學期 |
105-2 |
|
授課對象 |
工學院 建築與城鄉研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
王志弘 |
|
課號 |
BP7186 |
|
課程識別碼 |
544 M4770 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期四A,B,C(18:25~21:05) |
|
上課地點 |
工綜305 |
|
備註 |
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：15人
外系人數限制：2人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1052BP7186_tech |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
■課程介紹：
基礎設施（infrastructure）是都市發展的條件、成果，以及象徵性展現。道路、橋梁、電訊、電力、天然氣、供水和排水等技術系統和都市服務，不僅支持著城市的順利運轉，構成都市景觀，還是社會關係與過程的環節、經濟發展和財務投資的重點，也是政治爭議及慾望投射的焦點。因此，基礎設施作為都市功能和都市形式的承載體，可說是「都市意義」（urban meaning）和運轉的重要基礎。再者，供應人類需求的基礎設施，也蘊含了人與自然的互動與共構，或者說，涉及了人類對自然資源的擷取、改造、輸送與想像。
於是，基礎設施是探討現代性、都市性、技術發展，以及人與自然之關係的重要媒介。它是生產和遞送必要物質、財貨與服務之持續流動的人造環境與過程的網絡。基礎設施的核心特質為系統、網絡、連結、循環、流動，自然也藉此轉化而與人類社會產生關連。因此，基礎設施乃社會－自然的技術複合體，構成人類生活的環境或氛圍，更是人類之社會－物質存有與流變（social-material ontology and becoming）的關鍵部分。
本課程介紹晚近國際學界對於基礎設施的新取向，亦即超越狹隘的工程、科技、財務和管理觀點，以政治、社會和文化為探討重點，考察基礎設施所體現的技術與社會、人類與自然、知識與實作的關係。本課程首先介紹基礎設施、現代性和技術政治等概念，然後研讀特定個案研究成果，包括核能發電、電力網、資訊基礎設施、天然氣管線、供水管線、運河、水壩、道路等。最後，本課程並延伸論及基礎設施的僵固性、基礎設施和日常生活，以及基礎設施失靈危機等議題。
|
|
課程目標 |
■課程目標：
本課程目標在於令修課者 (1) 掌握基礎設施之技術政治的重要理論和經驗研究成果；(2) 通過閱讀、報告、討論和實際課題研究，學習運用既有理論概念來探討基礎設施政治議題；(3) 通過實際基礎設施議題的探討和掌握，摸索與既有理論取向對話的可能性。
■適合對象：碩士班二年級以上與博士班學生。
|
|
課程要求 |
■課程要求：
盡力閱讀課程材料，勇於發問，勤於出席。修習者的投入與表現，對本課程能否順利運作非常重要。本課程採取講演和討論課（seminar）並行方式，每次上課由教師講授和提示重點，並由參與者分配導讀該週的閱讀材料，每篇文章報告時間，必須控制於十五分鐘，盡量留時間發問和討論，探討能跟理論概念對話的經驗議題。報告者必須分發書面提要（必須包含三百字以內之摘述，主要論點和論證邏輯之說明【配合論證圖示】，以及評論和問題）。
沒有分配到當週閱讀材料導讀的同學，則需繳交針對某一篇或全部閱讀材料的讀書心得和提問，至少一頁。旁聽的同學，不需分配閱讀材料的導讀，也不必繳交作業，但必須每堂課繳交讀書心得與提問。
本課程的設計份量，需要修課者在課堂外花費四倍以上的時間，也就是3 X 4＝12個小時，包括閱讀教材、與同學討論、撰寫摘要或讀書心得及提問的時間。
■摘要寫作要點：
書面摘要必須於首頁列明報告文獻書目（APA格式）、日期、報告人，先有三百字摘要，述明整篇文章的問題意識和主要論點。然後是經過消化的、條理分明的內容概述。換言之，不宜逐段摘譯，最好是整理出文中討論的主要問題，以及作者對這些問題的回答或爭辯，建議以圖表方式整理出主要的論證架構，也可以搭配一些圖片，譬如說作者照片、書影或文中提到的人物和事件圖片。如果直接引述文中語句或段落，必須以不同字體清楚標示，並加註頁碼。最後，必須針對文獻內容提出問題，或是可供延伸討論的經驗議題。
書面摘要和提問討論單，都要於當日下午五點以前，上傳至本課程Ceiba網頁討論區。
■作業要求與評分：
1.學術書評：針對本課程開列的一本或數本專書，撰寫符合學術期刊規格之書評，三千至五千字，佔15%。
2.期末報告：以特定都市與區域之基礎設施為主題的學術論文一篇，必須以經驗材料為基礎，運用本課程提到的概念來協助分析。該經驗現象可以位於台灣或其他國家，也可以是歷史材料。該項作業的具體題目，必須事先與教師商議，並撰寫一份期末報告計畫書，說明問題意識、相關文獻和研究方法等（約三頁）。學期中先繳交初稿，經教師批閱後，於學期最後一周繳交完稿，並準備課堂口頭報告。期末報告的規格和排版必須符合學術要求，可參照《台灣社會學刊》或《台灣社會學》的格式。完稿必須包含中英文題目、中文摘要和關鍵詞等項目；字數以一萬五千字為度。期末報告計畫書佔5%，期末報告初稿佔20%，期末報告完稿佔10%，合計35%。
4.平時表現：包含出席狀況10%、參與討論10%、課堂口頭報告與書面摘要表現30%等，合計50 %。
5.各項報告須準時繳交，遲交一天扣五分（以扣除五十分為上限），但期末報告不可遲交。繳交時間明定於各周進度中。
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 |
|
指定閱讀 |
授課內容與進度
□閱讀材料註記 * 號者將放置於課程網頁，請自行下載。其餘材料請自行準備。閱讀材料份量將視上課情況調整。
第一週 課程介紹：何謂基礎設施？ 2/23
□閱讀材料
1.Harvey, Penny, Casper Bruun Jensen and Atsuro Morita (2017) Introduction: Infrastructural complications. In P. Harvey, C.B. Jensen and A. Morita (eds.), Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion (pp. 1-22). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.*
2.Carse, Ashley (2017) Keyword infrastructure: How a humble French engineering term shaped the modern world. In P. Harvey, C.B. Jensen and A. Morita (eds.), Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion (pp. 27-39). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.*
3.Larkin Brian (2013) The Politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42: 327-343.*
4.Harvey, Penelope (2012) The topological quality of infrastructural relation: An ethnographic approach. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4/5): 76-92.*
5.Jensen, Casper Bruun and Atsuro Monita (2015) Infrastructures as ontological experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1: 81-87.*
□參考材料
1.Star, Susan Leigh (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43: 377-391.*
2.Edwards, Paul N. et al. (2007) Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions and, design. Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures.*
3.Furlong, Kathryn (2010) Small technologies, big change: Rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4): 460-482.*
4.Monstadt, Jochen (2009) Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: Insights from technology and urban studies. Environment and Planning A, 41(8): 1924-1942.*
5.Penny Harvey et al. (2015) Attention to infrastructure offers a welcome reconfiguration of anthropological approaches to the political. The 2015 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory (GDAT).*
6.Penny Harvey et al (eds.) (2014) Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion. London: Routledge.*
第二週 基礎設施、技術與現代性 3/2
□閱讀材料
1.Misa, Thomas J. (2003) The compelling tangle of modernity and technology. In Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.), Modernity and Technology (pp. 1-30 ). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Feenberg, Andrew (2003) Modernity theory and technology studies: Reflections on bridging the gap. In Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.), Modernity and Technology (pp. 73-104). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.Edwards, Paul N. (2003) Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.), Modernity and Technology (pp. 185-225). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.張宏輝（2015）分解與組合：韋伯論技術與現代性的隱微但極具影響的觀點。思與言，53(1): 53-108。*
5.賴曉黎（2013）技術之本質－海德格〈技術的追問〉再思考。東吳哲學學報，27: 33-72。*
□參考材料
1.Feenberg, Andrew (1999) Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.*
2.Soppelsa, Peter S. (2009) The Fragility of Modernity: Infrastructure and Everyday Life in Paris, 1870-1914. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan.*
3.Mitchell, Timothy (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.*
4.Minuchin, Leandro (2016) The politics of construction: Towards a theory of material articulations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(5): 895-913.*
第三週 從技術系統到技術政治 3/9
□閱讀材料
1.Hughes, Thomas P. (1989) The Evolution of Large Technological Systems. In Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 51-82). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.（王志弘中譯：大型技術系統的演變）*
2.Winner, Langdon (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18(3): 362-378.*
3.Sutheerawatthana, Pitch and Takayuki Minato (2009) The relation of technology to politics in infrastructure development: The chain phenomenon and its relation to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 17: 199-209.*
4.von Schnitzler, Antina (2013) Traveling technologies: Infrastructure, ethical regimes and the materiality of politics in South Africa. Cultural Anthropology, 28(4): 670-693.*
□參考材料
1.Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor J. Pinch (eds.) (1989) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Hughes, Thomas Parke (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.*
3.Allen, Michael Thad and Gabrielle Hecht (eds.)(2001) Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.von Schnitzler Antina (2008) Citizenship prepaid: water, calculability, and techno-politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(4): 899-917.*
5.von Schnitzler Antina (2014) Performing dignity: Human rights, citizenship and the techno-politics of law in South Africa. American Ethnologist, 41(2): 336-350.*
第四週 法蘭西之光：二戰後的核能與國族認同 (I) 3/16
□閱讀材料：
1.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Introduction. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
2.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) A technological nation. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 21-53). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
3.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technopolitical regimes. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 55-90). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
4.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technopolitics in the Fifth Republic. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 91-129). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
5.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technological Unions. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 131-162). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
□參考材料
1.Hecht, Gabrielle (2001) Technology, politics and national identity in France. In Michael Thad Allen and Gabrielle Hecht (eds.), Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes (pp. 253-293). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Hecht, Gabrielle (ed.)(2011) Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.Rowland , Nicholas J. and Jan-Hendrik Passoth (2015) Infrastructure and the state in science and technology studies. Social Studies of Science, 45(1): 137-145.*
第五週 法蘭西之光：二戰後的核能與國族認同 (II) 3/23
□閱讀材料
1.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Regimes of work. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 163-199). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
2.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technological spectacles. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 201-240). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
3.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Atomic vintage. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 241-270). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
4.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Warring systems. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 271-323). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
5.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Conclusion. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 325-339). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
第六週 都市電網的能源、權力與抗議：電力城市的地理 3/30
□閱讀材料
1.Moss, Timothy (2014) Socio-technical change and the politics of urban infrastructure: Managing energy in Berlin between dictatorship and democracy. Urban Studies, 51(7): 1432-1448.*
2.Hughes, Thomas P. (2004) 美國的電氣化過程（楊佳羚、林宗德譯），吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟編《科技渴望社會》（頁19-77）。台北：群學。＊
3.Babourkova, Rosalina (2016) Plovdiv: (De-)racialising electricity access? Entanglements of the material and the discursive. In Andrés Luque-Ayala and Jonathan Silver (eds.), Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City (pp. 45-64). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
4.Criqui, Laure (2016) Delhi: Questioning Urban Planning in the Electrification of Irregular Settlements. In Andrés Luque-Ayala and Jonathan Silver (eds.), Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City (pp. 86-111). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
5.Verdeil, Eric (2016) Beirut, metropolis of darkness: The politics of urban electricity grids. In Andrés Luque-Ayala and Jonathan Silver (eds.), Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City (pp. 45-64). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
□參考材料
1.Luque-Ayala, Andrés and Jonathan Silver (eds.) (2016) Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
2.Special issue articles in Urban Studies, Vol. 51, No.7. Urban energy transitions: Places, processes and politics of socio-technical change.
第七週 碎裂都市論：網絡化基礎設施、技術移動性與都市狀況 4/6
□閱讀材料
1.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) Introduction. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (pp. 7-36). London: Routledge.*
2.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) The city as sociotechnical process. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (pp. 178-216). London: Routledge.*
3.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) Conclusion and postscript. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (pp. 381-420). London: Routledge.*
4.Jensen, Casper Bruun (2007) Infrastructural fractals: Revisiting the micro-macro distinction in social theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5): 832-850.*
5.Nguyen, Lily U. (2016) Infrastructural action in Vietnam: Inverting the techno-politics of hacking in the global South. New Media & Society, 18(4): 637-652.*
□參考材料
1.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (1996) Telecommunications and the City_ Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.*
2.Graham, Stephen (2000) Constructing premium network spaces: Reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1): 183-200.*
3.Edwards, Paul N., Steven J. Jackson, Geoffrey, C. Bowker and Robin Williams (2009) Introduction: Agenda for infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5): 364-374.*
4.Knox, Hannah, Mike Savage and Penny Harvey (2006) Social networks and the study of relations networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, 35(1): 113-140.*
5.Young, Douglas and Roger Keil (2010) Reconnecting the disconnected: The politics of infrastructure in the in-between city. Cities, 27: 87-95.*
6.Young, Douglas and Roger Keil (2014) Locating the urban in-between: Tracking the urban politics of infrastructure in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5): 1589-1608.*
第八週 物質政治：管線爭論 4/13
□閱讀材料
1.Barry, Andrew (2013) Introduction. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline (pp. 1-30). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
2.Barry, Andrew (2013) The Georgian route: Between political and physical geography. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline (pp. 31-56). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
3.Barry, Andrew (2013) Visible impacts. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline (pp. 116-136). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
4.Barry, Andrew (2013) Material politics. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline (pp. 137-153). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
5.Barry, Andrew (2013) Conclusion. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline (pp. 177-186). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
□參考材料
1.廖昱凱（2016）書評Material Politics: Disputes Along The Pipeline。地理學報，80: 81-86。*
2.Sheller, Mimi (2014) Global energy cultures of speed and lightness: Materials, mobilities and transnational power. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5): 127-154.*
■繳交期末報告計劃書
第九週 管線政治、爭議水體 (I) 4/20
□閱讀材料
1.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Introduction: Embedded infrastructures. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 1-19). Durham: Duke University Press.*
2.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Unmapping the distribution network. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 21-61). Durham: Duke University Press.
3.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Marketizing urban development. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 62-81). Durham: Duke University Press.
4.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Hydraulic shambles. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 82-97). Durham: Duke University Press.
5.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Becoming a slum. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 98-127). Durham: Duke University Press.
□參考材料
1.Björkman, Lisa (2014) Becoming a slum: From municipal colony to illegal settlement in liberalization-Era Mumbai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1): 36-59.*
2.McFarlane, Colin (2008) Governing the contaminated city: Infrastructure and sanitation in colonial and post-colonial Bombay. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2): 415-435.*
3.Meehan, Katie M. (2014) Tool-power: Water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum, 57: 215-224.*
4.Loftus, Alex and Hug March (2016) Financializing desalination: Rethinking the returns of big infrastructure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1): 46-61.*
5.Van de Poel, Ibo (2008) The bugs eat the waste: What else is there to know: Changing professional hegemony in the design of sewage treatment plants. Social Studies of Science, 38(4): 605-634.*
第十週 管線政治、爭議水體 (II) 4/27
□閱讀材料
1.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Brokering water knowledge. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 128-164). Durham: Duke University Press.
2.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Corruption. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 165-197). Durham: Duke University Press.
3.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Power, authority, and hydraulic spectacle. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 198-226). Durham: Duke University Press.
4.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Conclusion: Pipe politics. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 227-234). Durham: Duke University Press.
第十一週 水泥革命：大壩、冷戰地緣政治與美國墾務局 5/4
□閱讀材料
1.Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Large dams, technopolitics, and development. Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation (pp. 1-27). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.*
2.Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Building a “world-wide fraternity”: The Bureau, China, and John Savage. Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation (pp. 28-51). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.*
3.Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Cold war geopolitics, technical expertise, and the Mekong Project. Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation (pp. 102-124). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.*
4.Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Large dams and the contemporary geopolitics of development. Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation (pp. 125-146). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.*
5.Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Conclusion: Large dams and other things. Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation (pp. 147-158). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.*
□參考材料
1.Lombrado, Joseph D. (2016) The global politics of large dams: Notes on Christopher J Sneddon's Concrete Revolution. All Azimuth, 5(2): 95-102.*
第十二週 巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (I) 5/11
□閱讀材料
1.Carse, Ashley (2014) Introduction: The machete and the freighter. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 1-23). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Carse, Ashley (2014) Monte. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 27-35). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.Carse, Ashley (2014) Making the Panama canal watershed. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 37-58). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.Carse, Ashley (2014) Frank Robinson’s map. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 59-68). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
5.Carse, Ashley (2014) Life along the river (Miocene-1903). Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 71-92). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
6.Carse, Ashley (2014) Canal construction and the politics of water. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 93-119). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
□參考材料
1.Carse, Ashley (2012) Nature as infrastructure: Making and managing the Panama Canal watershed. Social Studies of Science, 42(4): 539-563.*
2.Maurer, Noel and Carlos Yu (2011) The Big Ditch: How America Took, Built, Ran, and Ultimately Gave Away the Panama Canal. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.*
■繳交學術書評
第十三週 巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (II) 5/18
□閱讀材料
1.Carse, Ashley (2014) Pueblos perdidos, or How the lake ate the river. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 121-130). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Carse, Ashley (2014) The agricultural possibilities of the canal zone. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 131-156). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.Carse, Ashley (2014) Getting across and getting around. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 159-166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.Carse, Ashley (2014) The world united, Panama divided. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 167-183). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
5.Carse, Ashley (2014) The conquest of the jungle. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 185-204). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
6.Carse, Ashley (2014) Weeds. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 207-217). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
7.Carse, Ashley (2014) A demanding environment. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 219-221). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
第十四週 道路：基礎設施與專業技能的人類學 5/25
□閱讀材料
1.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Introduction: Anthropology, infrastructure, and expertise. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 1-20). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
2.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Historical futures. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 21-51). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
3.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Integration and difference. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 52-76). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
4.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Figures in the soil. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 79-110). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
5.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Health and safety and the politics of safe living. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 111-133). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
6.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Corruption and public works. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 134-160). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
7.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Impossible publics. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 163-185). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
8.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Conclusions: Inauguration, engineering, and the politics of infrastructural form. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 186-201). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
□參考材料
1.Dalakoglou, Dimitris (2010) The road: An ethnography of the Albanian-Greek cross-border motorway. American Ethnologist, 37(1): 132-149.*
2.Dalakoglou, Dimitris and Penny Harvey (2012) Roads and anthropology: Ethnographic perspectives on space, time and (im)mobility. Mobilities, 7(4): 459-465.*
3.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2012) The enchantments of infrastructure. Mobilities, 7(4): 521-536.*
4.Shove, Elizabeth, Matt Watson, and Nicola Spurling (2015) Conceptualizing connections: Energy demand, infrastructures and social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(3): 274-287.*
5.Norton, Peter D. (2008) Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
6.曾威誌（2012）從城牆到林蔭大道─由臺北三線道路的興建看臺北市的現代化。國立台北藝術大學建築與文化資產研究所碩士論文。*
7.Easterling, Keller (1999) Organization Space: Landscapes, Highways, and Houses in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
■繳交期末報告初稿
第十五週 拆建城市：都市社會技術變遷的僵固性 6/1
□閱讀材料
1.Hommels, Anique (2005) Obduracy in the city: Three conceptual models. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 1-39). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
2.Hommels, Anique (2005) Attempts to chane Hoog Catharijne. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 41-80). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
3.Hommels, Anique (2005) Trying to reconstruct the highway that cuts through Maastricht. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 81-126). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
4.Hommels, Anique (2005) The spatial renewal of the Bijlmermeer. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 127-172). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
5.Hommels, Anique (2005) Understanding obduracy in urban socio-technical change. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 173-198). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
□參考材料
1.Hommels, Anique (2000) Obduracy and urban sociotechnical change: Changing Plan Hoog Catharijne. Urban Affairs Review, 35(5): 649-676.*
2.Hommels, Anique (2005) Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(3): 323-351.*
第十六週 基礎設施生活 6/8
□閱讀材料
1.Simone, AbdouMaliq (2015) Relational infrastructures in postcolonial urban worlds. In Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane (eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 17-38). New York: Routledge.
2.Salamanca, Omar Jabary (2015) Road 443: Cementing dispossession, normalizaing segregation and disrupting everyday life in Palestine. In Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane (eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 114-136). New York: Routledge.
3.Brown, Stephanie Terreni (2015) Kampala’s sanitary regime: Whose toilet is it anyway?. In Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane (eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 153-173). New York: Routledge.
4.Shaw, Rob (2015) Cleaning up the streets: Newcastle-upon-Tyne’s nighttime neighbourhood service team. In Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane (eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 174-196). New York: Routledge.
5.Broto, Vanesa Castán and Harriet Bulkeley (2015) Maintaining experiments and the material agency of the urban. In Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane (eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 199-218). New York: Routledge.
□參考材料
1.Amin, Ash (2014) Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7/8): 137-161.*
2.Simone, AbdouMaliq (2004) People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3): 407-429.*
3.Hall, Suzanne, Julia King and Robin Finlay (2016) Migrant infrastructure: Transaction economies in Birmingham and Leicester, UK. Urban Studies, 1-17. DOI: 10.1177/0042098016634586 .*
第十七週 基礎設施的失敗 6/22
□閱讀材料
1.Graham, Stephen (2010) When infrastructures fail. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 1-26). New York: Routledge.*
2.Little, Richard G. (2010) Managing the risk of cascading failure in complex urban infrastructures. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 27-39). New York: Routledge.*
3.Luke, Timothy W. (2010) Power loss or blackout: The electricity network collapse of August 2003 in North America. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 55-68). New York: Routledge.*
4.Graham, Stephen (2010) Disruption by design: Urban infrastructure and political violence. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 111-129). New York: Routledge.*
5.McFarlane, Colin (2010) Infrastructure, interruption, and inequality: Urban life in the global south. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 131-144). New York: Routledge.*
□參考材料
1.Howe, Cymene et al. (2016) Paradoxical infrastructures: Ruins, retrofit, and risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(3): 547-565.*
2.Kirkpatrick, L. Owen and Michael Peter Smith (2011) The infrastructural limits to growth: Rethinking the urban growth machine in times of fiscal crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3): 477-503.*
3.Gandy, Matthew (2006) Planning, anti-planning and the infrastructure crisis facing metropolitan Lagos. Urban Studies, 43(2): 371-396.*
4.Graham Stephan and Nigel Thrift (2007) Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3): 1-25.*
第十八週 期末報告發表會 6/22
■繳交期末報告：修課同學準備十五分鐘以內的口頭報告（製作PPT），並繳交期末報告完稿。
|
|
參考書目 |
■主要教材：
Barry, Andrew (2013) Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline. New York: John Wiley & Sons.*
Björkman, Lisa (2015) Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai. Durham: Duke University Press.
Carse, Ashley (2014) Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.*
Graham, Stephen (ed.)(2010) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. New York: Routledge.*
Graham, Stephen and Colin McFarlane (eds.)(2015) Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context. New York: Routledge.
Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
Hommels, Anique (2005) Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
Luque-Ayala, Andrés and Jonathan Silver (eds.) (2016) Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Misa, Thomas J., Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.)(2003) Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.*
■參考書目
Allen, Michael Thad and Gabrielle Hecht (eds.)(2001) Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Easterling, Keller (1999) Organization Space: Landscapes, Highways and Houses in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (1996) Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
Guy, Simon, Simon Marvin, Will Medd, and Timothy Moss (eds.)(2011) Shaping Urban Infrastructures: Intermediaries and the Governance of Socio-Technical Networks. London: Earthscan.
Harvey, Penny, Casper Bruun Jensen and Atsuro Morita (eds.)(2017) Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Högselius, Per, Anique Hommels, Arne Kaijser and Erik van der Vleuten (eds.)(2014) The Making of Europe's Critical Infrastructure: Common Connections and Shared Vulnerabilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hughes, Thomas Parke (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hughes, Thomas Parke (2005) Human-built World: How to Think about Technology and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maurer, Noel and Carlos Yu (2011) The Big Ditch: How America Took, Built, Ran, and Ultimately Gave Away the Panama Canal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Norton, Peter D. (2008) Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
學術書評 |
15% |
針對本課程開列的一本或數本專書，撰寫符合學術期刊規格之書評，三千至五千字，佔15%。 |
2. |
期末報告 |
35% |
以特定都市與區域之基礎設施為主題的學術論文一篇，必須以經驗材料為基礎，運用本課程提到的概念來協助分析。該經驗現象可以位於台灣或其他國家，也可以是歷史材料。該項作業的具體題目，必須事先與教師商議，並撰寫一份期末報告計畫書，說明問題意識、相關文獻和研究方法等（約三頁）。學期中先繳交初稿，經教師批閱後，於學期最後一周繳交完稿，並準備課堂口頭報告。期末報告的規格和排版必須符合學術要求，可參照《台灣社會學刊》或《台灣社會學》的格式。完稿必須包含中英文題目、中文摘要和關鍵詞等項目；字數以一萬五千字為度。期末報告計畫書佔5%，期末報告初稿佔20%，期末報告完稿佔10%，合計35%。 |
3. |
平時表現 |
50% |
包含出席狀況10%、參與討論10%、課堂口頭報告與書面摘要表現30%等，合計50 %。 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/23 |
課程介紹：何謂基礎設施？ |
|
第2週 |
3/02 |
基礎設施、技術與現代性 |
|
第3週 |
3/09 |
從技術系統到技術政治 |
|
第4週 |
3/16 |
法蘭西之光：二戰後的核能與國族認同 (I) |
|
第5週 |
3/23 |
法蘭西之光：二戰後的核能與國族認同 (II) |
|
第6週 |
3/30 |
都市電網的能源、權力與抗議：電力城市的地理 |
|
第7週 |
4/06 |
碎裂都市論：網絡化基礎設施、技術移動性與都市狀況 |
|
第8週 |
4/13 |
物質政治：管線爭論 |
|
第9週 |
4/20 |
管線政治、爭議水體 (I) |
|
第10週 |
4/27 |
管線政治、爭議水體 (II) |
|
第11週 |
5/04 |
水泥革命：大壩、冷戰地緣政治與美國墾務局 |
|
第12週 |
5/11 |
巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (I) |
|
第13週 |
5/18 |
巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (II) |
|
第14週 |
5/25 |
道路：基礎設施與專業技能的人類學 |
|
第15週 |
6/01 |
拆建城市：都市社會技術變遷的僵固性 |
|
第16週 |
6/08 |
基礎設施生活 |
|
第17週 |
6/15 |
基礎設施的失敗 |
|
第18週 |
6/22 |
期末報告發表會 |
|